With the growing resistance to post emergent herbicides in many weed populations the message going to farmers is that they need to use more pre-emergent herbicides in their farming system.

The problem with pre-emergent herbicides is that they are dependent on activation by soil moisture. Droughts and increasingly variable rainfall patterns can result in insufficient soil moisture to activate the herbicide which leads to poor weed control. The other concern is that herbicides remain active in the soil because they have not been broken down by bacterial activity or hydrolysis.
In many parts of the country, the 2018 winter crop season saw large areas of crop damaged by soil herbicide residues, due to the dry conditions between spraying in 2017 and crop emergence in 2018.

Chickpeas absorbing Group B herbicide from deeper in the soil, Tulloona, NSW. Image: AGRONOMO

The level of herbicide remaining in the soil will be determined by:

  • initial application rate and herbicide type
  • soil pH – most herbicides last longer in alkaline soils while Group B imidazolinones become more water soluble and can move down the soil profile
  • the amount of rainfall received between application and sowing
  • soil temperature – warm, damp soil speeds herbicide breakdown
  • soil texture, that is, the proportion of clay to sand and silt – sandy soils are more likely to have herbicide damage problems than clay soils
  • amount of cultivation – cultivation usually speeds herbicide loss and can dilute it by soil mixing
  • crop type and variety
  • soil organic matter content – high soil organic matter levels reduce the effect of soil active herbicides. However most Australian soils are classed as low in organic matter
  • microbial activity for some herbicides – most of the above factors affect microbial activity

As can be seen from the factors which affect herbicide persistence in the soil, and many of these are out of the farmer’s control.
Most labels will give crop plant back periods based on the amount of rain received since application, soil characteristics and herbicide rate. If you are on the borderline for these characteristics can you safely sow the next crop?

1. Susceptible weeds damaged or dying

If there are weeds susceptible to the herbicide present and they show no damage symptoms, it is likely there are no damaging herbicide residues.
However, care must be taken to check whether the particular weeds have not germinated from below or above the possible herbicide band. This prevents weeds absorbing herbicide.
If it hasn’t rained, you will be none the wiser.
2. Laboratory testing

Laboratory soil testing will cost approximately over $400 per herbicide group and the herbicides to be tested must be specified. The technique most often used is the Gas-Liquid Mass Spectrometer.
Laboratory testing can tell how much herbicide is remaining, however most farmers will not need this level of detail.
3. Pot Test (Bioassay)

The simple pot test outlined here does not give an exact measure of the amount of residue present but does indicate whether there is enough herbicide remaining to damage sensitive crops.
The test will take at least 3-4 weeks to perform, so forward planning is essential if sowing and marketing windows are not to be put at risk.
The ‘pot test’ was developed by the late KP Buchholtz for testing of atrazine residues, however it can be used for most soil active herbicides.

  • 1. Take samples from several locations around the field. Remember that a test is only as good as the sample collected. Sample enough areas to prevent missing any possible high residue areas such as headlands. It may be useful to take separate samples from areas you suspect of being abnormally high. Take samples to the normal cultivation depth, or to 10 cm in non-cult